Thread:Deathstalker666/@comment-26005008-20160407215658/@comment-3547390-20160712211514

Hahaha, I still will need some idea of when we are recording, so don't forget to tell me or else we won't be getting far off the ground :P

Lots of games drive me mad. Pretty much anything prior to FPS titles and gaming in general prior to the late 90s. Even then, I really only like FPS games, only really beginning to stretch out in the 2000s. I pretty much did a 6 hour checkout of Daggerfall, though due to the fact that I hit the wrong key when binding, I pretty much made it so nothing recorded. Still, it was an absolute horrific mess, I would play Arena again and suffer through that before I ever bothered with Daggerfall. At least Arena had life, Daggerfall just felt dead and like it was complex to just be annoying. At least in Arena I never had to worry if a mound was the random castle I needed, especially as I would be told where I was. At least in Arena I could sell things and pick things up without having to constantly switch back and forth between two/three buttons that makes picking up anything tiresome. Daggerfall has some benefits, but overall it is a terrible, terrible experience which looks miserable even when played back-to-back with Arena.

A big reason I would't check out certain titles with my chronology thing was because of these torturous titles. Why on earth would I ever dare sit through Prince of Persia? That game is just such a headache to play, it is never nice when you feel cheated instead of the game giving you proper challenge. Then again, I don't like challenge if it drags out hellholes. You could say Elder Scrolls Arena is a challenge. As I said in my playthrough, I definitely gave that game a chance to win me over, and at the end of the day I would rather torture myself there than with the mess that was Daggerfall.