Thread:Deathstalker666/@comment-26005008-20160407215658/@comment-3547390-20160429213947

I believe in equal opportunity for everyone. If you want to work, you get paid for your work and get the rights to more stuff than someone who is lazy and doesn't wish to help society at all. It just is incentive and the reward to not be lazy. Then you add in the logic that those more capable will get it done better and some jobs are more useful than others, and you get to the point where how much you want to work and how much effort you put into something correlates with how much you get out of life. Why should someone get to enjoy the luxuries in life by doing absolutely nothing?

People may want things, but if they don't have the capabilities, then they shouldn't have the right to them as it is unfair to the person who does have the capabilities. I have knowledge that can go to solving all diseases, but I deserve to be in the same situation as someone who is unable to learn such info. If someone lacks skills and just wants to climb on the cart, why should I be pulling for them? Why should they get a free ride on a cart to begin with?

7 + 2 = 9. 9 looks like 8 with a missing piece, that means 8 -1 = 7. That is 8 numbers, minus that 7 is 1. As you had one final answer, that is also 1. That means 11. 7/11. What does all this mean? 7/11 was a part time job.

Planet of the Apes, when the Gorillas took over. Communist Russia, when the Guerrillas took over. That is all I got out of this.

Exploiting the air doesn't make sense, but people will find a way to exploit one another with or without government. Without, we are just doing the extreme version of socialism, since we are permitting everyone to get for nothing. How does one get a trade to get those bananas to trade for drugs?

Actually, it still is all natural selection. Humans as a species are protected from the general dangers of nature, meaning they don't thin the herd in the methods other animals would. If we were living without luxuries, such people would probably die out, but since we live in a world where such conditions can exist without risk, they get passed on. The argument for adoption doesn't make sense, it says earlier that Darwinians believe every woman should let another adopt her child, so how is it harmful to the species as a Darwinian?