Thread:Deathstalker666/@comment-1915529-20150523192506/@comment-1915529-20150701203639

Oh no, you just gave me a thought that is not nice. Call of Duty’s endless list of different stories/characters is similar to James Bond. So perhaps there will be CoD every year for the next 50 years and because the idiot 10-year-olds of today will be grown up, the people of 2050 will look back fondly on CoD as this state of the art series that has stood the test of time.... aargh!!

It seems to be based on whoever is in the marketing department at the time. After all, Doom 3 is remake of Doom and it didn’t make any difference except to make it easier to distinguish the two in convocation. However we can still call it Doom 4 no matter what some idiot thinks.

Going independent would be nice of course but it would require so much effort. The main thing against it would be that it would become a chore to make it as good as QuakeWiki is now. And when it becomes a chore it does become irritating and you just give up. Also while I respect why he may have been put off by the crap at the top, it's a small problem when you think what we have. Plus most good wikias offer great things for fans. QuakeWiki defiantly falls into the ‘this looks good’ pot and I think we should be proud to keep it. It’s the price we have to pay for the easiness.

That is greatest gripe with the Quake series. How cool and wonderful would it have been if Quake II and Quake III had been proper sequels to Quake in both name and game? An epic saga as one warrior confronts the evil of the other dimension.

I tried searching one page on all of them. Ours is better by about 5000%. No need to worry. The page I searched by the way was Armagon. But yeh, not having crap at the top makes it a lot better, like this wiki was 5 years ago. It because we give so much information though on things like Armagon and Episode 2, that we out class every other Quake site in the world.